Arguably, your best piece to date. This was an experiential trifecta: a skillful weaving of the insight provided by your latino, political and religious backgrounds. Left the church in CA in the 90s and have been sad to watch it, and many of the Catholics I know, slide into far-right politics. The elevation of Pope Leo was , indeed, a brilliant, as you say, check-mate. You covered this transition decision quite masterfully. Kudos.
The significance of this Papal selection has also not gone unnoticed in the “post evangelical” Protestant community, which has also strongly rejected Christian Nationalism, and the weaponization of the Gospel against the poor.
I am concerned that my pronouncements about ‘evangelicals’ sweeps up all Protestants. That would be neither accurate nor fair. Thank you for pointing this out Jim.
Mike, Like you, I grew up in a Catholic household. And up until 6 months ago, I might have leaned towards lumping all Protestant Christians under the “evangelical” banner. What opened my eyes was a young pastor named Zach Lambert. If anyone listened in, is curious about the post-evangelical community, check out the “Public Theology” SubStack here: https://open.substack.com/pub/zachwlambert
I’m joining the chorus of praise for this wide-ranging analysis. Your earlier piece on the papal election was really good and this even better. History, philosophy, theology, social impact- Mike, you weave a complex tapestry into beautiful understanding.
I left catholicism around 1969 but of course it never left me entirely after being such a big part of my formative years. Your observations demonstrate deep awareness of trends and forces in the church (both as a system of moral beliefs AND as an organization). Thank you for sharing your insights in this hopeful viewpoint.
I agree with Susan, your best piece to date. Sacred bulwark? Theological kudzu? Elegantly executed ecclesiastical checkmate? Ignatius would be proud and Augustine would be impressed. This is as spot on as any piece I’ve read on Leo from any source. Although your analysis of Hispanic Catholics is - as ever- completely correct, I would offer that not only Hispanic Catholics but all Catholics should heed your warning and act accordingly, “Leo's papacy presents Hispanic Catholics with a vision of Catholicism that judges both American political parties by Gospel standards rather than the reverse.” The sacred bulwark ( in fact, the Holy Spirit) is calling us to follow the lead of our new shepherd.
Again, outstanding piece. Can’t thank you enough for your relentless efforts to be a voice in the wilderness.
Also, what a beautiful gift to your mom. Rome is such a beguiling place and the Vatican is such a profoundly moving destination- the coming home vibes are real. At the heart of all your work is unabashed love- for our gente, for our country- but that pic at the beginning says it all for this piece. Don’t ever lose sight of that POV. It shines brightly, and rightly.
Thank you. What a lovely message Laura. Mom and I are sitting in Florence at the foot of the Duomo and I read her your kind words - such a kind birthday gift. Thank you! Thank you!
I am disturbed at how inseparable the word 'Republican' and 'Christian' have become in so many minds. Your article brings back the heart of God for each and every individual. I am glad God is in control of all these things ... makes me 'less disturbed'. Thanks again, Jonathan
Agree- this is a beautiful, insightful reflection on the Catholic church’s powerful statement of God’s grace and compassion. I pray for health and protection for Pope Leo.
I am very moved by your analysis of Pope Leo's election and how it shields Catholicism, Catholics, and the soul of multiculturalism from the distraction of politics and pseudo Christian systems and theories. I feel so happy because as I read your wonderful essay, I kept saying yes, yes, yes to all of your beautifully written points.
Born in 1952, raised in a traditional Catholic family and educated in a parochial school where my sister and I both received the best elementary school education, I fell away from the church when I was in high school.
Over the course of 60 years I have investigated all of the world religions and practiced some of them including the Baha'i faith, but even that eventually fell short for me.
What brought me back into the fold of Catholicism, believe it or not, was being deeply impacted by the movie "Conclave," and without getting too deep into it, I am so grateful for what I have read here today because it validates all of the resurgence of my faith in Christ that I haven't had for so many years. Amazingly, recently speaking with my sister who's only a year younger, she is having in her own way the same Renaissance with Catholicism and this is bringing us closer together.
Somehow I have lost a sentence or two but I will close here by saying Thank you very much, Mike, for making your essay available to me. It's spiritual nourishment. For this I am very grateful and looking forward to perhaps subscribing to your
Substack. With sincere appreciation, Grace Callahan
So, I am reading this on a Sunday morning and I'm now wide awake with my consciousness raised yet again (during the women's movement, this was Steinim's job 😉). What a profoundly incredible piece, Mike!
I especially like this,
". . . the most elegantly executed ecclesiastical checkmate in recent memory . . . " Dayum!
I was raised Catholic and left because I saw politics being brought into sermons instead of things like "love thy neighbor" at a time when civil rights was exploding across the country, the war was on in Vietnam, protests against the war & white supremacy became violent, assassinations, etc., I felt the church could have been more helpful in bringing people together. In my 30's, I converted to Orthodox Judaism and chose a Hebrew name, "Estherhadas." From the book of Esther and Hadas has a chasidic influence from the same book. Around 15-20 years later, I saw the same influences creeping into Orthodox Judaism that I saw in the '60's-'70's in the Catholic Church. I became spiritually disappointed and disengaged myself. I remain so. I will be watching with curious excitement to see what Pope Leo does in this upside down world in an attempt to bring us together and to fight the forces of Christian nationalism. Whatever he does, I will be looking for yet another, "elegantly executed ecclesiastical checkmate." Btw, that's a beautiful picture of you and your mom - Mom looks great!
Rebuttal to "How Pope Leo’s Election Shields Catholicism from American Evangelical Nationalism"
By Brandon S. Johnson
Mike Madrid’s article is a polished piece of political theater masquerading as theological analysis. It relies on emotional generalizations, undefined accusations, and strawman caricatures to portray faithful Christians—both Catholic and Evangelical—as a threat to be neutralized rather than brothers in Christ contending for truth in the public square.
Madrid never defines “Christian Nationalism” or “Evangelical Nationalism”—he merely invokes them like theological bogeymen to discredit those who hold to historic Christian morality, including clear biblical teaching on sexuality, family, and the sanctity of life. Ironically, he accuses Christians of politicizing the faith while openly celebrating the election of a pope as a political counterweight to American conservatives.
Most faithful Catholics and evangelicals don’t worship America—we honor God above nation. But we do believe nations matter, moral order matters, and Christian principles should influence public life. That’s not “toxic nationalism.” That’s biblical discipleship.
If the Catholic Church is truly to be a “sacred bulwark,” let it stand against the spirit of the age—not merely against Christians who take Scripture seriously.
You called me "part of a cult." That’s a serious accusation—one that demands definition, not just emotional assertion. So let’s be precise. When you say 'cult,' what exactly do you mean? Are you using the term in its scholarly sense, or are you just using it to describe ideas you dislike or communities you disagree with? Let’s consider some real definitions:
Theological Definition (Jude 1:3): A cult is any religious group that denies the essential doctrines of the historic Christian faith—such as the Trinity, the deity of Christ, salvation by grace through faith, and the authority of Scripture. Is that what you're accusing me of?
Behavioral Definition: Cults are often defined by controlling, authoritarian leadership, the demand for total loyalty, and enforced separation from family, dissenters, or outside voices. That’s abusive and dangerous—but again, is that what you're accusing me of?
Sociological/Academic Definition: In religious studies, a 'cult' is simply a term used to describe new or divergent religious movements that have not become mainstream. It’s a neutral descriptor in that context. That doesn't make them inherently dangerous or false—it just means they're not established.
So again—which definition are you using?
Because simply saying 'you’re in a cult' is a lazy smear unless you’re prepared to back it up with evidence, reasoning, and clarity. Otherwise, it's just a way to shut down a conversation you’re uncomfortable having."
There’s nothing sincere or legitimate about your “Christianity”. One look at your feed makes it clear you’re a partisan GOP hack that has bastardized and defiled a beautiful religion. I’ve met hundreds of grifters like you over three decades in GOP politics.
If you think anything you’re promoting would be supported by Jesus Christ you have no understanding of His message. None. But you already know that.
Arguably, your best piece to date. This was an experiential trifecta: a skillful weaving of the insight provided by your latino, political and religious backgrounds. Left the church in CA in the 90s and have been sad to watch it, and many of the Catholics I know, slide into far-right politics. The elevation of Pope Leo was , indeed, a brilliant, as you say, check-mate. You covered this transition decision quite masterfully. Kudos.
Thank you 🙏🏼
Beautifully written!
The Gospel survives the angry threat of American fascism!
“It is easier for a camel to walk through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven!”
The significance of this Papal selection has also not gone unnoticed in the “post evangelical” Protestant community, which has also strongly rejected Christian Nationalism, and the weaponization of the Gospel against the poor.
Thank you for this excellent piece, Mike.
I am concerned that my pronouncements about ‘evangelicals’ sweeps up all Protestants. That would be neither accurate nor fair. Thank you for pointing this out Jim.
Mike, Like you, I grew up in a Catholic household. And up until 6 months ago, I might have leaned towards lumping all Protestant Christians under the “evangelical” banner. What opened my eyes was a young pastor named Zach Lambert. If anyone listened in, is curious about the post-evangelical community, check out the “Public Theology” SubStack here: https://open.substack.com/pub/zachwlambert
I’m joining the chorus of praise for this wide-ranging analysis. Your earlier piece on the papal election was really good and this even better. History, philosophy, theology, social impact- Mike, you weave a complex tapestry into beautiful understanding.
I left catholicism around 1969 but of course it never left me entirely after being such a big part of my formative years. Your observations demonstrate deep awareness of trends and forces in the church (both as a system of moral beliefs AND as an organization). Thank you for sharing your insights in this hopeful viewpoint.
Of course, the Holy Spirit has a sense of humor! Excellent piece.
I agree with Susan, your best piece to date. Sacred bulwark? Theological kudzu? Elegantly executed ecclesiastical checkmate? Ignatius would be proud and Augustine would be impressed. This is as spot on as any piece I’ve read on Leo from any source. Although your analysis of Hispanic Catholics is - as ever- completely correct, I would offer that not only Hispanic Catholics but all Catholics should heed your warning and act accordingly, “Leo's papacy presents Hispanic Catholics with a vision of Catholicism that judges both American political parties by Gospel standards rather than the reverse.” The sacred bulwark ( in fact, the Holy Spirit) is calling us to follow the lead of our new shepherd.
Again, outstanding piece. Can’t thank you enough for your relentless efforts to be a voice in the wilderness.
Also, what a beautiful gift to your mom. Rome is such a beguiling place and the Vatican is such a profoundly moving destination- the coming home vibes are real. At the heart of all your work is unabashed love- for our gente, for our country- but that pic at the beginning says it all for this piece. Don’t ever lose sight of that POV. It shines brightly, and rightly.
Thank you, muchisimas gracias, and grazie mille.
Thank you. What a lovely message Laura. Mom and I are sitting in Florence at the foot of the Duomo and I read her your kind words - such a kind birthday gift. Thank you! Thank you!
Wonderful! Florence is so beautiful, enjoy and soak it all in. Happy birthday!
Excellent piece of writing. I had not totally grasped the significance of electing Pope Leo. Thank you.
Thanks for this. Very much appreciated.
I am disturbed at how inseparable the word 'Republican' and 'Christian' have become in so many minds. Your article brings back the heart of God for each and every individual. I am glad God is in control of all these things ... makes me 'less disturbed'. Thanks again, Jonathan
Agree- this is a beautiful, insightful reflection on the Catholic church’s powerful statement of God’s grace and compassion. I pray for health and protection for Pope Leo.
(Also so fun to see your mom in the pic!!)
I am very moved by your analysis of Pope Leo's election and how it shields Catholicism, Catholics, and the soul of multiculturalism from the distraction of politics and pseudo Christian systems and theories. I feel so happy because as I read your wonderful essay, I kept saying yes, yes, yes to all of your beautifully written points.
Born in 1952, raised in a traditional Catholic family and educated in a parochial school where my sister and I both received the best elementary school education, I fell away from the church when I was in high school.
Over the course of 60 years I have investigated all of the world religions and practiced some of them including the Baha'i faith, but even that eventually fell short for me.
What brought me back into the fold of Catholicism, believe it or not, was being deeply impacted by the movie "Conclave," and without getting too deep into it, I am so grateful for what I have read here today because it validates all of the resurgence of my faith in Christ that I haven't had for so many years. Amazingly, recently speaking with my sister who's only a year younger, she is having in her own way the same Renaissance with Catholicism and this is bringing us closer together.
Somehow I have lost a sentence or two but I will close here by saying Thank you very much, Mike, for making your essay available to me. It's spiritual nourishment. For this I am very grateful and looking forward to perhaps subscribing to your
Substack. With sincere appreciation, Grace Callahan
So let me close by saying, Thank you, Mike,
So, I am reading this on a Sunday morning and I'm now wide awake with my consciousness raised yet again (during the women's movement, this was Steinim's job 😉). What a profoundly incredible piece, Mike!
I especially like this,
". . . the most elegantly executed ecclesiastical checkmate in recent memory . . . " Dayum!
I was raised Catholic and left because I saw politics being brought into sermons instead of things like "love thy neighbor" at a time when civil rights was exploding across the country, the war was on in Vietnam, protests against the war & white supremacy became violent, assassinations, etc., I felt the church could have been more helpful in bringing people together. In my 30's, I converted to Orthodox Judaism and chose a Hebrew name, "Estherhadas." From the book of Esther and Hadas has a chasidic influence from the same book. Around 15-20 years later, I saw the same influences creeping into Orthodox Judaism that I saw in the '60's-'70's in the Catholic Church. I became spiritually disappointed and disengaged myself. I remain so. I will be watching with curious excitement to see what Pope Leo does in this upside down world in an attempt to bring us together and to fight the forces of Christian nationalism. Whatever he does, I will be looking for yet another, "elegantly executed ecclesiastical checkmate." Btw, that's a beautiful picture of you and your mom - Mom looks great!
Rebuttal to "How Pope Leo’s Election Shields Catholicism from American Evangelical Nationalism"
By Brandon S. Johnson
Mike Madrid’s article is a polished piece of political theater masquerading as theological analysis. It relies on emotional generalizations, undefined accusations, and strawman caricatures to portray faithful Christians—both Catholic and Evangelical—as a threat to be neutralized rather than brothers in Christ contending for truth in the public square.
Madrid never defines “Christian Nationalism” or “Evangelical Nationalism”—he merely invokes them like theological bogeymen to discredit those who hold to historic Christian morality, including clear biblical teaching on sexuality, family, and the sanctity of life. Ironically, he accuses Christians of politicizing the faith while openly celebrating the election of a pope as a political counterweight to American conservatives.
Most faithful Catholics and evangelicals don’t worship America—we honor God above nation. But we do believe nations matter, moral order matters, and Christian principles should influence public life. That’s not “toxic nationalism.” That’s biblical discipleship.
If the Catholic Church is truly to be a “sacred bulwark,” let it stand against the spirit of the age—not merely against Christians who take Scripture seriously.
You’re in a cult and it’s not Christian. Seek help.
You called me "part of a cult." That’s a serious accusation—one that demands definition, not just emotional assertion. So let’s be precise. When you say 'cult,' what exactly do you mean? Are you using the term in its scholarly sense, or are you just using it to describe ideas you dislike or communities you disagree with? Let’s consider some real definitions:
Theological Definition (Jude 1:3): A cult is any religious group that denies the essential doctrines of the historic Christian faith—such as the Trinity, the deity of Christ, salvation by grace through faith, and the authority of Scripture. Is that what you're accusing me of?
Behavioral Definition: Cults are often defined by controlling, authoritarian leadership, the demand for total loyalty, and enforced separation from family, dissenters, or outside voices. That’s abusive and dangerous—but again, is that what you're accusing me of?
Sociological/Academic Definition: In religious studies, a 'cult' is simply a term used to describe new or divergent religious movements that have not become mainstream. It’s a neutral descriptor in that context. That doesn't make them inherently dangerous or false—it just means they're not established.
So again—which definition are you using?
Because simply saying 'you’re in a cult' is a lazy smear unless you’re prepared to back it up with evidence, reasoning, and clarity. Otherwise, it's just a way to shut down a conversation you’re uncomfortable having."
There’s nothing sincere or legitimate about your “Christianity”. One look at your feed makes it clear you’re a partisan GOP hack that has bastardized and defiled a beautiful religion. I’ve met hundreds of grifters like you over three decades in GOP politics.
If you think anything you’re promoting would be supported by Jesus Christ you have no understanding of His message. None. But you already know that.
When we plan god laughs